Risk-Based Vulnerability Prioritization: Beyond CVSS.
Onit Security proves you can't sort your way out of a backlog, using Decision-Based Exposure Management to resolve entire classes of exposures with a single decision.
Onit Security proves you can't sort your way out of a backlog, using Decision-Based Exposure Management to resolve entire classes of exposures with a single decision.
Every vendor claims "autonomous," but most have just wrapped an agent around the same old ticket-by-ticket workflow. The capability to automate roughly 90% of the resolution lifecycle already exists. The last 10% isn't a technical limit, it's a trust problem.
Enterprise MTTR has barely moved in a decade, still 60 to 100 days for critical vulnerabilities despite record tool spend. The bottleneck isn't detection or prioritization. It's the manual coordination behind every fix.
Gartner formalized CTEM in 2022 and the industry embraced it instantly. Four years later, almost no one has actually operationalized it. The ambition was right; what's missing is the execution layer that turns the framework into work that gets done.
Security teams don't have a visibility problem. They have a fragmentation problem. Every scanner produces its own output and severity logic with no shared view, so consolidating it all into one dashboard unifies what you see, not what you fix.
Exposure management promised a shift from reactive patching to proactive risk reduction. It hasn't delivered: the average serious vulnerability still takes 60 to 100 days to fix. The reason is structural, built around activity instead of decisions.